Brief Description
This unit discusses appropriate levels of accuracy in various
contexts. It distinguishes between variation from human error and
bias from faulty instruments. It shows that using the mean
reduces variation and demonstrates how to spot bias. Finally it
discusses sensible answers in conversions and calculations.
Design Time: 4 hours
Aims and Objectives
On completion of this unit pupils should appreciate the
appropriate level of accuracy to use in measurements and
calculations and the distinction between variation and bias in
causing errors. An optional section explains why the mean is
likely to give a more accurate answer.
Pupils will have practised using the mean and collecting data.
They should be more aware of the meaning of bias and variability
and see how bias can be useful. They also see an example of using
randomness in understanding errors.
Pupils are introduced to the idea of outliers and the range of
a distribution.
Prerequisites
Pupils need to understand significant figures and be aware of
Imperial units. They should be able to work with decimal and
directed numbers and calculate the mean of a set of individual
results.
Equipment and Planning
All pupils will need rulers and protractors. Pupils also need
cm squared paper, tracing paper and an A4 sheet of paper
in Section A2. Class measurements for Section B3
need to be collected, perhaps on the blackboard. Dotty paper with
dots at the vertices of 1 cm squares would be useful for Section B5.
Section B5 needs eight matchboxes, eight envelopes
and about 100 metal washers or objects of similar weight. The
experiment can be done by pupils individually whilst the class is
working through Section A. Section D is an
option for more able pupils. For Section D2 each pupil
or group of pupils requires four cubes or dice, two faces on each
to be marked - 1, 0 and l respectively; alternatively coding
could be used.
Detailed Notes
Section A
The opening questions are designed to promote a discussion on
the level of accuracy appropriate in various situations. In some
scientific experiments timing needs to be very precise; in others
precision is not so important. Pupils should realize the need to
think about the context in order to decide the level of accuracy
required.
A2
The difference between 0.56 and 0.57 litres can be
demonstrated as two 5ml medicine spoonfuls. Measuring the amount
of milk poured into a cup for a cup of tea (in ml) will also help
pupils see the futility of quoting five significant figures for
the conversion factor in this context.
Other examples where more accuracy is needed are (i)
scientific experiments and (ii) timing in modern sports events
such as at the Olympic Games. Electronic calculators usually give
too many figures for sensible accuracy.
A3
Some explicit examples in which pupils need to assess
whether the accuracy is at the right level are given.
A4
These give examples where mathematics teachers may face
increasing problems with the advent of calculators for pupils.
Pupils may not be familiar with the formulae used. The diameter
of a 10p piece is 2.8 cm.
A5
This gives two more examples where figures are given too
accurately (a common abuse of statistics). The football figures
were presumably the 'gate' figures. Other people also watched the
match, e.g. the managers and trainers, policemen, St John's
Ambulance men. It is impossible to count the population of a
country like India to the nearest one, and in any case the
population is changing almost every minute.
Section B
Here pupils make some measurements of their own to provide
concrete data for discussion of levels of accuracy.
B1
Pupils are left to find their own way of measuring the
diagonal, which is bigger than their rulers. They may need to be
reminded of a method of using part squares to find the area of
the given region: the region could be traced and cm square graph
paper used. The traced map could then be used in Section B5
with dotty paper.
This section shows the degree of variability that can be
expected in fairly simple circumstances. It is worthwhile using
other data from the science department to amplify this section.
An example is the timing of the fall of a ball-bearing through a
viscous fluid.
B2
Pupils should see that John's results are not accurate
enough, while Ann's are too precise. You could illustrate this
practically. Pass round two sheets of paper 25 cm and 30 cm long.
Ask pupils to mark one as l (longer), s (shorter)
without lining one against the other. Similarly, pass round two
sheets 25.71 and 25.72 cm long (as near as possible) for pupils
to distinguish.
B3
Pupils are asked to choose a sensible answer, after
discarding outliers. They will need the class measurements from
Section B1. The 8.2 was measured in inches, not
centimetres. Clearly this is a major error and should not be
considered in the same light as the other readings.
Distinguishing errors and outliers is not easy. Anything well
outside three standard deviations from the mean of all the data
could be ignored.
B4
This uses the mean to reduce variation and improve
accuracy.
B5
Here dotty paper and randomness are used to estimate
area. Further verbal instructions may be needed by slower pupils.
The rule of counting the dots is equivalent to counting each
square if its centre is in the region. The dots can be thought of
as being at the centres of the centimetre square grid. A small
piece of tracing paper, but large enough to cover the region,
should be used.
B6
This experiment shows that, although individuals may
have widely varying answers, the class answer can be surprisingly
accurate. You need eight identical matchboxes. In seven boxes put
in 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18 washers, and in the eighth 'standard'
box put in 13 washers. Other identical metal objects such as
screws could be used instead. The idea is that it should not be
easy to tell by hand the differences in weight. You need seven
envelopes and about 100 slips of paper marked l, h,
or s. Pupils take it in turn to compare each of the
seven boxes with the standard one and put the appropriate slip of
paper in the appropriate envelope. At the end, count up the
results and give the true order to the class.
Section C
Accuracy depends on being unbiased and on minimizing variation.
C1
Both Ann's and Barry's results are biased to the right,
but Ann is more accurate than Barry. This section shows how one
might spot bias.
C2
Pupils are given examples of measurements in which they
have to decide on bias. They may need reminding that a set of
measurements is to be assessed, not each individual measurement
in a, b.
C3
Biased estimates are useful in situations where errors
in one direction can lead to problems or even disasters. Pupils
could be encouraged to give their own examples.
C4
Normal advice for the mean is one significant figure
more than the original data, but clearly this rule depends on the
size of sample. This could be mentioned to pupils here.
*Section D
This optional section introduces a very simple probability
model to try to help explain why using the mean of a number of
readings is likely to be more accurate than one reading.
D1
Here the improvement from one measurement to the mean of
two measurements is investigated theoretically. Two measurements
give:
Mean error |
-1 |
-1/2 |
0 |
1/2 |
1 |
Proportion |
1/9 |
2/9 |
3/9 |
2/9 |
1/9 |
Clearly this is an improvement.
D2
The distribution of the mean of four measurements is
simulated using cubes or dice. The numbers -1, 0, I should be
stuck on the faces of the cubes. The theoretical possibilities
are:
Mean error |
-1 |
-3/4 |
-1/2 |
-1/4 |
0 |
1/4 |
1/2 |
3/4 |
1 |
Proportion |
1/81 |
4/81 |
10/81 |
16/81 |
19/81 |
16/81 |
10/81 |
4/81 |
1/81 |
.012 |
.049 |
.123 |
.196 |
.235 |
.198 |
.123 |
.049 |
.012 |
The line graph of the simulation should show the greater
concentration near 0 and hence the greater likelihood of being
near the accurate answer. If you don't have any plain cubes, then
ordinary dice can be used and coded as described in the pupil
unit.
Answers
A2 |
a |
No. Housewives don't measure so
accurately in cooking |
|
|
|
A3 |
a |
Too accurate; 100 metres |
|
b |
Too accurate; 114 g (or even 100 g) |
|
c |
Sensible |
|
d |
Not accurate enough; about 22.7 (or 23)
litres |
|
e |
Not accurate enough; about $13.91 with
the exchange rate quoted |
|
f |
Too accurate; 36.9oC |
|
g |
Too accurate; 4047 sq metres (or 4000 m2) |
|
h |
Not accurate enough; 21/2d |
|
i |
Not accurate enough; 2.27 (or 21/4)
kg |
|
|
|
A4 |
a |
Not accurate enough; 8.8 cm |
|
b |
Sensible |
|
c |
Too accurate; 6.16 sq cm |
|
|
|
A5 |
a |
People may be there illegally; 39600 or
40000 |
|
b |
The population is not static each hour,
never mind per day! 534 300 000 |
|
|
|
B1 |
a |
About 36.4 cm |
|
b |
About 43o; 134o |
|
c |
About 18 sq cm |
|
|
|
B2 |
a |
Yes; no |
|
b |
No; not accurate enough; no |
|
c |
No; no |
|
d |
No; too accurate |
|
e |
Probably measured the acute angle |
|
|
|
B3 |
a |
8.2; measured in inches not centimetres |
|
b |
Variation due to human (or instrument)
error; also all sheets of paper may not be identical in
size |
|
c |
20.8 cm |
|
d |
20.6 to 20.9 cm |
|
|
|
C1 |
b |
Rifle biased, or possibly bad aiming |
|
c |
Bad aiming; rifle biased and they didn't
allow for it |
|
f |
Yes |
|
|
|
C2 |
a |
1, unbiased; 2, biased below; 3, biased
above; 4, unbiased |
|
b |
1, unbiased; 2, biased above; probably
read from the end of the ruler, not the zero mark |
|
c |
Unbiased |
|
d |
Biased above |
|
e |
Biased below |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
Answers here are open to discussion |
|
a |
Over 120 feet |
|
b |
About 250-270, depending on evenness and
exact dimensions of walls (certainly more than 242) |
|
c |
Slightly smaller and use putty (it is
impossible to cut off, say,0 3 cm, if too large.) |
|
d |
About 60p (more than 50p) |
|
e |
Probably three rolls, depending on walls,
windows, doorways and pattern 'drop' |
|
f |
About 170 cm |
|
g |
About 48 mph |
|
h |
Just less; easier to add more |
|
|
|
D1 |
b |
|
Second
measurement |
-1 |
0 |
1 |
First
measurement |
-1 |
-1 |
- 1/2 |
0 |
0 |
- 1/2 |
0 |
1/2 |
1 |
0 |
1/2 |
1 |
Table 2
|
|
c |
3/9 = 1/3 |
|
d |
See detailed notes. |
Test Questions
- Your friend says the classroom is 4.12312 metres wide.
Write down a more sensible answer.
- The official population of England is 46417600. Your
friend wants to know about how many people live in
England. What will you tell him?
- David and John roll balls at a hole. The pictures show
where the balls finished.
Describe David's results. How do they differ from John's
results?
- Jane weighed a piece of rubber three times. Her results
were: 8.4 g, 8.3 g and 8.4 g. The true weight was 9.1 g.
What can you say about her results?
- A boy estimates how long it takes to cycle to school. Why
is a biased estimate useful?
- Six boys look at their watches as the school bus leaves
school one afternoon. They record the time as 3.29, 3.33,
3.28, 6.17, 3.27 and 3.30.
- What is a sensible time to give?
- What would you do about the 6.17 result?
- How do you think the 6.17 result happened?
- Ignore the odd boy out in the previous question. Use the
other five results to get a more accurate estimate of the
time the bus left the school.
- Charles weighs a conker once. Ann weighs it four times
and takes the average weight. Write down which of the
next three statements is correct.
- Ann's answer is more accurate.
- Ann's answer is probably more accurate.
- Charles's answer is more accurate.
- How can 'dotty' tracing paper be used to estimate the
area of a difficult shape?
- How can you use the same paper to get a better estimate
of the area?
Answers
1 |
|
4 metres or 4.1 metres |
|
|
|
2 |
|
46 or 461/2
million |
|
|
|
3 |
|
David's results are close together but
biased above the hole. They are different from John's
results, which are not biased but more varied. |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Biased results |
|
|
|
5 |
|
To avoid being late, overestimate. |
|
|
|
6 |
a |
3.30 |
|
b |
Ignore it. |
|
c |
Misread (hour and minute) hands, or the
watch had stopped. |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Attempt at 1/5 (3.29
+ 3.33 + 3.28 + 3.27 + 3.30); answer 3.29 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
b is correct. |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Count the dots. |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Throw at random; take mean. |
Connections with Other Published Units from the Project
Other Units at the Same Level (Level 2)
Authors Anonymous
On the Ball
Seeing is Believing
Fair Play
Opinion Matter
Units at Other Levels in the Same or Allied Areas of the Curriculum
Level 1
Practice makes Perfect
If at first...
Level 3
Cutting it Fine
Multiplying People
Net Catch
Level 4
Smoking and Health
This unit is particularly relevant to: Science, Mathematics.
Interconnections between Concepts and Techniques Used in these Units
These are detailed in the following table. The code number in
the left-hand column refers to the items spelled out in more
detail in Chapter 5 of Teaching Statistics 11-16.
An item mentioned under Statistical Prerequisites
needs to be covered before this unit is taught. Units which
introduce this idea or technique are listed alongside.
An item mentioned under Idea or Technique Used is not
specifically introduced or necessarily pointed out as such in the
unit. There may be one or more specific examples of a more
general concept. No previous experience is necessary with these
items before teaching the unit, but rnore practice can be
obtained before or afterwards by using the other units listed in
the two columns alongside.
An item mentioned under Idea or Technique Introduced
occurs specifically in the unit and, if a technique, there will
be specific detailed instruction for carrying it out. Further
practice and reinforcement can be carried out by using the other
units listed alongside.
Code No. |
Statistical
Prerequisites |
|
|
None |
|
|
Idea or
Technique Used |
Introduced
in |
Also
Used in |
1.1a |
Census of a small population simple data |
|
Practice makes Perfect
Cutting it Fine
Net Catch
Multiplying People |
1.2a |
Using discrete data |
Seeing is Believing |
If at first...
Fair Play
Cutting it Fine
Authors Anonymous
Opinion Matters |
1.2b |
Using continuous data |
Seeing is Believing |
Practice makes Perfect
Cutting it Fine |
|
Idea or
Technique Introduced |
Also Used in |
1.2c |
Problems of classification of data |
Authors Anonymous
Opinion Matters |
1.3c |
Sampling from distribution or infinite
populations |
If at first...
Fair Play
Cutting it Fine |
1.3e |
Variability in samples |
Practice makes Perfect
Fair Play
Smoking and Health
If at first...
Net Catch
On the Ball
Cutting it Fine |
1.4b |
Using someone else's directly counted or
measured data |
Multiplying People
Smoking and Health |
3.1c |
Mean for small data set |
Practice makes Perfect
If at first...
Authors Anonymous
On the Ball
Seeing is Believing
Fair Play
Net Catch
Cutting it Fine
Smoking and Health |
4.1i |
Bias (as in biased dice) |
|
5d |
Spotting possible errors (outliers) as
not fitting general pattern |
Cutting it Fine
Multiplying People
Smoking and Health |
5i |
Estimating population figures from
samples |
On the Ball
Net Catch
Seeing is Believing
Smoking and Health
Fair Play |
5w |
Large samples are better for inference |
On the Ball
Fair Play
Net Catch |
Page R1
|
Second
measurement |
-1 |
0 |
1 |
First
measurement |
-1 |
-1 |
- 1/2 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1/2 |
|
Table 2 - Mean error in two measurements
Mean error |
-1 |
-1/2 |
0 |
1/2 |
1 |
Proportion |
1/9 |
2/9 |
|
|
|
Table 3 - Proportions of each mean error
with two measurements
Total error |
Mean error |
Tally |
Frequency |
Proportion |
-4 |
|
|
|
|
-3 |
|
|
|
|
-2 |
|
|
|
|
-1 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
4 |
|
Table 4 - Four measurements
|